Based On The Book Written by Dr Eli G Jones, MD (USA)
Surgery Not A Cure For Cancer
There are about 50,000 people who die of cancer in the United States annually. From my own experience in the treatment of cancer in all its form, for forty years, I feel confident that ninety-five percent of these cases could have been saved without an operation. Over the tombstones of the most of them might be written, " Butchered in the name of science"
For the past 200 years the great mass of the medical profession have considered cancer as a local disease and they have made it their practice to cut out everything that looks like a cancer.
Dr.Waslsh, in his able work on cancers, says: "The knife can neither be regarded as a means of curing cancer or pronologing the exixtence of the person afficted with the disease."
Dr.Thomas W.Cooke, Surgeon of the Cancer Hospital, London, England , Says:
" From 1851 to 1863 there were 413 cases of cancer operated on at the Cancer Hospital, London,England. The everage time before the cancer returned was only 6 1/2 months."
Dr. Monroe, of Scotland, opreated on "
sixty cases of cancer; at the end of two years only four out of the sixty operations were successful".
In 1896 I kept record of fifty cases of cancer of the tongue that had been operated upon, and not a single cure was effected.
Dr. James Wood of the Royal College, London, said :
"Gentlement, I have operated on some thousand cases of cancer and they all returned but six and they were not cancer."
Sir Benjamin Broddie (one of the fathers in surgery) said, after he had removed 500 cancers of the breast, that "he would not removed another without telling the patient that the operation would not prolong her life".
Sir James Paget, one of England's greatest physicians,says in speaking of cancer does not return is not more than one in five hundres. In my own practice about four out of five cases of cancer had returned worse than it was before.
About one hundred years ago the early fathers of the botanic school of Medicine considered cancer as a blood or constitutional disease and treated is as such and cured it. No form of purely local treatment will never cure this malady, because it is in the blood and must be reached through the blood.
in 1869 I treated my first case of cancer. I called it a blood disease. I treated it with our simple botanic remedies and cured it.
In this States, I saw a case of cancer of the breast that had been operated on three times, the last time the surgeon made a through examination with a microscope, after the operation, and told the lady that she would ' guarantee that the cancer would never return'. In six months the cancer was doing business at the old stand.
I saw a case of cancer of the breast from New York State that had been cut out eight times and the disease had returned worse than ever.
May God hasten the day when it will be considered a crime to cut out a cancer after 43 years of experience with cancer I can honestly say that I have never seen one genuine case of cancer permenantly cured by a surgical operation. To cut out a cancer is the worst form a malpractice, for it is only trying to remove the effect without touching the cause, from an extensive correspondence with physicians from every States in the Union, I find that the rank and file of the profession are tired and disgusted with operation of cancer for they have seen them return time and time gain.
They are more than anxious to find a better and saner method of treatment for cancer that offers at least some hope of a cure....